By Bahram Esfahani/ Geostrategy Studies Network
The Iranian political arena has recently witnessed an escalation in the intensity of internal conflicts and rivalries between various political wings and movements. This phenomenon, which is called in the Iranian media "the war of wolves", reflects the depth of divisions within the Iranian political system and its impact on the decision-making process and the management of the country's affairs. In this report, we will analyze the articles and opinions published in the bulletin of Iranian newspapers on 10 Mordad 1403, to shed light on the most prominent manifestations of these conflicts and their repercussions on the Iranian political scene.
The article in the newspaper "Ham Mihan" entitled "From criticizing our absence to accusing your presence" deals with the debate between the various political parties in Iran. The writer points out that there is mutual criticism between the political wings, with each party accusing the other of failing to manage the country's affairs. This debate reflects the state of mistrust prevailing among the various components of the Iranian political system.
The article in the newspaper "Arman Melli" also sheds light on the criticism directed at the current government by prominent political figures. In an article titled "Karbaschi's exposure of the 13th government's promise to create a million jobs," the writer points out that the government promised to create a million jobs, but in reality, four million jobs have been lost. This criticism reflects the state of political polarization and dissatisfaction with the performance of the current government.
Etemad newspaper's article titled "All the misfortunes of one decision" discussed the repercussions of some political decisions on the internal situation in Iran. The writer points out that some decisions taken by the government have exacerbated internal crises and increased the intensity of differences between various political parties. The article also highlights how these decisions contribute to deepening the gap between the government and the people.
In another article, Kayhan newspaper, in its article "How did Haddad Adel pour water into the anthill?", discusses the statements and movements of some prominent political figures and their impact on the internal political scene. The writer points out that some statements have led to controversy and deepening divisions within the political system, which further complicates matters.
These articles reflect the depth of the internal divisions and conflicts in the Iranian political system. These conflicts are not limited to the differences between different political movements, but also extend to within the movements themselves. This phenomenon indicates a deep crisis of confidence within the Iranian political system, which may negatively affect the government's ability to confront the internal and external challenges facing the country.
Under these circumstances, it seems that achieving the required political and economic reforms will be difficult without a real national consensus. The continuation of these conflicts may lead to increased political instability and deepening the economic and social crises that the country is suffering from.
Ultimately, the current situation in Iran requires a comprehensive reassessment of domestic and foreign policies, with the need to work to strengthen trust between the various political parties and open channels for constructive dialogue. Achieving political and social stability requires joint efforts and effective cooperation between all components of Iranian society.
